Project Maturity¶
mixle is not one uniformly mature surface. The core probability library is
the reliable center of the project, while several applied, neural, task,
reasoning, design, and production-oriented namespaces are still moving quickly.
That does not make those surfaces peripheral. It means they need clearer
expectations, examples, and validation habits.
Use this page to decide where to start and how much verification to require before depending on a feature. Use mixle and Package Map for the full scope of what Mixle can do.
Maturity Map¶
Surface |
Current status |
Best use |
|---|---|---|
|
Stable core |
Distribution families, estimators, samplers, encoders, combinators, mixtures, HMMs, and common Bayesian families. |
|
Stable core |
MLE/EM/conjugate fitting for ordinary distribution and latent-model workflows. |
|
Usable, evolving |
Ranking, top-k, support traversal, quantization, conditioning, projection, and capability-gated distribution transformations. |
|
Active development |
Compact symbolic model expressions that lower to the stats/inference layer. Good for experiments, but check the generated model and route. |
|
Active development |
Stochastic-process families, temporal/event models, and CTMCs. |
|
Incubating applied helpers |
Neural leaves, language-model helpers, Gaussian processes, random
forests, graph models, induced grammars, POMDPs, and truncated DPM
helpers. These objects do not all share the maturity or exact contract
coverage of |
|
Active application/research workflows |
Task distillation, LLM uncertainty, semantic entropy, cascades, extraction, graph-producing LLMs, typed ontologies, evidence fusion, and reasoning workflows. |
|
New local application runtime |
Provenanced local knowledge stores, action-based reasoners, reusable skills, local-or-pool job boundaries, and decision telemetry. Validate retrieval, routing, scope, and governance behavior in the target application. |
|
Optional assembled workflow |
Local scientific reasoning with cached encoders, certified heads, and substrate-backed answering. Requires optional heavy dependencies and local model weights. |
|
Active application/research workflows |
Scientific design, Bayesian optimization, model-improvement loops, and anti-regression experiments. |
|
Practical helpers, not a platform |
Provenance headers, filesystem registries, scoring wrappers, activity logs, and drift reports. Treat these as building blocks around a fitted model, not as a full deployment system. |
What Is Safe To Build On First¶
For ordinary work, start with:
mixle.statsfor model families and estimators;mixle.inference.optimizefor fitting;mixle.describeto inspect what the fitted object supports;mixle.enumerationandmixle.opsonly after checking capabilities.
That path exercises the oldest and most coherent part of the codebase.
How To Treat mixle.models¶
mixle.models is useful, but it is not the conceptual center of the package.
It is a collection of applied helpers that connect specialized model families
to the rest of Mixle when that is practical.
The namespace currently mixes several levels of maturity:
tested utilities such as Gaussian-process helpers, random graph models, and random-forest conditionals;
neural leaves and compact language-model helpers that are useful for experiments but have more moving parts and optional dependencies;
research-oriented helpers for dependence discovery, induced grammars, knowledge graphs, POMDPs, DPMs, training search, and continual learning.
Use mixle.models when the specialized family is genuinely the right tool.
For ordinary distribution modeling, start with mixle.stats and
mixle.inference. Reach for mixle.models when the problem specifically
needs a neural leaf, Gaussian process, graph model, grammar, random forest,
DPM, POMDP, or other applied helper.
How To Treat The v0.6.2 Runtime Surfaces¶
The substrate, reasoner, pool, telemetry, and scientist layers are application surfaces. They are valuable because they connect fitted models to knowledge, skills, evidence, and deployment decisions, but they need application-level validation:
check retrieval quality and abstention thresholds with representative questions;
audit scope and sharing behavior before storing sensitive data;
treat pool placement as a priced decision and keep explicit confirmation for billable backends;
inspect telemetry logs before training learned routing or placement policy;
reload and re-score neural artifacts after serialization;
keep local model weights and optional dependencies pinned in deployment environments.